Are you are an agonistic democrat Why or Why not Essay

Are you are an battleful democrat Why or Why non - Essay ExampleAgonists might, in whatsoever cases, be seen as troublemakersdepending upon ones viewpoint. Agonist ideals differ more than that of the views of regular democrats because they insist upon arguing as a means to an end, not for another(prenominal) minds. Here it will be attempted to explore whether or not I am an agonistic Democrat why or why not and how a consideration of my own political life, my goals, and my experiences as an active citizen might shed light on the larger attractiveness and the applicability of an agonistic plan of attack to democratic politics. II. Am I An Agonistic Democrat? (400 words) Although many times terms can be unclear, I do not consider myself an agonistic Democrat. After all, One seldom finds a clear definition of the political.1 I dont on the dot consider myself a deliberative Democrat either by any means. Liberal democracyis a specific form of organizing politically human coexisten ce which results from the articulation between two different traditions on one side, political liberalismand, on the other side, the democratic tradition of popular sovereignty.2 Usually, deliberative Democrats and agonistic Democrats are antagonistic to each other anyway. ... I strongly believe that exhausting all diplomatic means in order to reach an agreement is the best solution to any type of conflict. corporal disputes are not alone barbaric still dated. Honestly, I dont feel that verbal arguments necessarily solve many problems either. Instead, politicians should focus upon toilsome not to arguebut, rather, in developing a consistent dialogue that focuses upon the real problems that are plaguing their constituents. Instead of arguing over petty trivialities, politiciansespecially Democratsshould be trying to shy away from political theater and the creation of drama for dramas sake. Its nice to give news organizations sound bytesbut when it comes down to brass tacks, words are just empty words until actions are aligned with those words. Democrats can argue until they are blue in the spiritbut until they ensure that positive actions are in line with what they are saying, the Democratsagonists alikewill not be taken seriously as a political party that can be trusted with the future of the country. Agonists in particular should abandon the notion that they must fight in order to uphold their point. In order to effect real change, the American people require genuine diplomats. III. Why or Why Not? (300 words) I think the reason why I do not consider myself agonistic is because I find arguing pedantic and puerile. Agonistic Democrats seem like they are only interested in petty argumentsinstead of arguing for the sake of producing true change. Aristotle claimed that the intimacy of ethical alliances limitthe number of our alliances.3 Agonistic Democrats are exactly what this country doesnt need. People who are out just to create drama